You still have not answer my question, where is the research on human being Sucralose being essential part of our diet. And if it can cause cancer in mice, I do not want it in my body.
I have no problem intaking food or even some chemicals into my body, but the problem I have is the low quality ingredients. After all, these are the things I am putting into my body, and I do research upon the ingredients that does not look right.
There are people like you who puts their trust in a company and expect them to have customer's interest as their top priority, but in real world the company strives by making money, and your health is not in their top priority, far too often it gets completely out of hand and cause embargo by consumers before they even make a change. Just recently they've found out there are more "lead" in soylent 1.5 by law in California, only contacted by the legal they had to put up the warning. That is just sickening.
I would much rather pay a little more and get some better ingredients, remove chemicals such as Sucralose, Vitamin D2, and replace it with some simple cane sugar and D3. They can even do a experiment and see if people are willing to pay a little more for better quality ingredients.
I buy soylent for sake of connivence, but I would prefer them to add some better quality ingredients and charge us a little more, and I refuse to drink another bottle that contains chemicals that has absolutely no utility in my body other than to "balance the taste", give me a break, you can use any other healthier sweetener to do that...